Wednesday, 24 October 2012

RESEARCH BASED ESSAYS - SEPT to NOVEMBER

Click the following link to find the web diagrams of the six topics assigned. You may choose any one of these topics for your essay. The date of submission is November 16, 2012

Web Diagrams for Sept-Oct-Nov Essays


***********************************
 

Saturday, 13 October 2012

The Browning Version - Post Reading Task

Watch:



The Browning Version - Key notes, Question Bank


AS YOU READ, OBSERVE:

1) The student-teacher relationship between Taplow and Frank vs. the relationship between Taplow and Crocker Harris

2) The portrait of Crocker Harris which emerges from the conversation between Taplow and Frank

3) Comparison of Frank with Harris as teachers at the same school

4) The concept of punishment, rules and bonding with students


QUESTION BANK

Q.1.  Comment on the attitude shown by Taplow towards Crocker-Harris?
Q.2   What impression of Frank do you get as a teacher?
Q.3.  What kind of person is Mr. Crocker-Harris?
Q.4.  Why is Taplow in school at 6:30p.m. on the last day of school?
Q.5.   Mr. Crocker-Harris is the subject of the conversation between Taplow and Frank. What kind of a picture emerges of Mr. Harris as a teacher and as a person?
Q.6.  Why is Taplow bitter?
Q.7.  Does Frank encourage Taplow's comments on Crocker - Harris?

Q.8.  Why do you think Harris called 'The Crock' or 'Himmler of the lower fifth'?
Q.9.  Why does Frank seem to envy Harris' fear in the students?
Q.10.  Describe Millie. What do you think happens after our extract ends?

The Browning Version - Pre Reading Task


Read the synopsis of the original play of which this chapter is an extract:

The play is about the last few days in the career of Andrew Crocker-Harris, an ageing Greek and Latin teacher at a British Public School. He is forced to retire due to health concerns and feels that he has become obsolete.

Taplow, a pupil who needs Crocker-Harris to pass him so he can go up to the next year, comes to him for help with his Greek, but Crocker-Harris is not in his rooms. Instead, Taplow meets Frank Hunter, another Master at the school. We find out (after Taplow leaves) that Hunter, and Crocker-Harris' wife, Millie, are carrying on an affair.

When Crocker-Harris returns, he first has the lesson with Taplow, where he begins to show his true feelings through his love for literature. Afterwards, the headmaster arrives to inform him that the school will not give him his pension because of his early retirement, though he was depending on it, and wishes him to relinquish his place in the end-of-term speech-giving to a popular sports master.

Mr. Gilbert, Crocker-Harris's successor at his teaching post, arrives to view the Crocker-Harrises' home. He seeks advice on the lower fifth, the year Crocker-Harris teaches, and how to control them. Crocker-Harris begins to relate to Gilbert his own sad experiences after Gilbert tells Crocker-Harris that the headmaster had referred to Crocker-Harris as the 'Himmler of the lower fifth'. Heinrich Himmler was a commander in Hitler's Nazi army. Crocker-Harris, who did not realise he was feared by the boys, is very disturbed by this title.

Taplow returns, and moves Crocker-Harris by giving him an inscribed version of Robert Browning's translation of Aeschylus' Agamemnon, at which point he breaks down crying. Millie, his wife, shows her callousness at Crocker-Harris's emotional state by ruining this fond moment by implying Taplow only gave the gift to get the grades. Hunter breaks off the affair with her, instead turning his sympathies to Crocker-Harris. Crocker-Harris informs him that he knew of Millie's affair with Hunter, as well as her previous ones, but despite this he does not wish to divorce her.

As the play ends, Hunter makes plans with a reluctant Crocker-Harris to meet him at his new place of work, and an uplifted Crocker-Harris telephones the headmaster saying that he will make his speech after the sports master, as is his right.

The 'Browning Version' of the title references the translation of the Greek tragedy given by Taplow, Agamemnon, in which Agamemnon is murdered by his wife, aided by her lover.


Read:          
E. R. Braithwaite's To Sir, With Love
Robert Browning's Agamemnon

Watch:       
To Sir, With Love 
Troy

Mother's Day - Post Reading Task: A Doll's House


Henrik Ibsen wrote 'A Doll's House' in 1879. The play is an astonishing yet accurate portrayal of how women were treated in the 1800's and how some are treated till date. It shows the controversial views of love and marriage and, divorce. It is a fore runner to women's rights and Feminism.

It was perhaps the first time that a woman walked out on her family seeking her own identity and slamming the orthodox door behind her. One critic noted, "That slammed door reverberated across the roof of the world."
 

Read this enthralling three-act play here
                  http://www.gutenberg.org/files/2542/2542-h/2542-h.htm



 

Mother's Day - Reading, Notes and Question Bank


ABOUT THE PLAYWRIGHT


J. B. Priestley


      1894 – 1984
      No memory of his birth mother. Had a kind step mother.
      Three wives and three daughters.
      Called by some the last ‘sage’ of English literature
      Refused knighthood and peerage


A BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO FEMINISM

The history of the modern western Feminist movements can be divided into three 'waves'. Each is described as dealing with different aspects of the same feminist issues:

      The first wave - women's suffrage movements of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries 
     (Read Virginia Woolf's - ‘A Room of One’s Own’ – divorce, contraceptives, abortion)
      The second wave - women's liberation movement beginning in the 1960s (which campaigned for legal and social equality for women. Read Simone de Beauvoir – 'Women as ‘the other’').
      The third wave - the perceived failures of second-wave feminism, beginning in the 1990s.


AS YOU READ, REMEMBER:

1) The play was written 1953 when feminism was still a relatively new concept and managed to raise eyebrows and drop jaws when mentioned.

2) Mrs. Pearson is the quintessential English housewife while Mrs. Fitzgerald represents the exotic mysteries of the east. The contrast makes them representative of the two extreme cultures.

3) Try and analyse the social and personal causes behind Mrs. Pearson's problems. Is she a victim of society or simply a woman unable to muster the courage required to usher change?

4) Are the characters of the story reflective of roles of men, children and neighbours in our own society? If a satire is a piece of writing that mocks the society or any part of it, highlighting its flaws in order to facilitate change, is this play a satire? Think about what is being mocked and which change is being subtly encouraged.

5) Mrs. Fitzgerald seems to be an answer to Mrs. Pearson's prayers. Remember that it is not Mrs. Pearson who actually initiates the change in the family's attitude.

6) 'The tea' becomes a symbol of the oppressed woman caught in the domestic arena. The tea is expected and taken for granted. The tea not being ready, even when not really wanted, is a shock to the family. It is a deviation from the norm, an unwelcome change.

7) Consider the role of a woman in a family: before Mrs. Fitzgerald and thereafter. Think about the traditional roles women play in society - daughter, sister, wife, mother. Think about whether these roles have changed and how? Trace them and find out how far back these changes occured. Further, retrospect about what further changes should be made.

8) Question yourself about whether Mrs. Pearson truly has the requisites to maintain the change initiated by Mrs. Fitzgerald. In the absence of the traits required, how long with the change survive?

9) Analyse the role of 'suspended disbelief' in the story. The magic seems an insignificant bit in the overall scheme of things and yet is central to the plot of the story.

10) Analyse the characters of the men and women in the play apart from Mrs. Pearson and Mrs. Fitzgerald. Reflect on the kind of family and social life the other characters represent.

11) Reflect on the fact that the play is written by a male playwright about the role of women in society.


QUESTION BANK:

Short answer questions –
Q.1. What is the main idea of the play? Has it been brought out effectively by the writer?
Q.2. How does Mrs. Pearson act with her children after exchanging personality with Mrs. Fitzgerald?
Q.3. How does Mrs. Pearson deal with her husband in her new personality?
Q.4. Why is Mrs. Pearson always ordered about by her family members?
Q.5. What advice did Mrs. Fitzgerald give Mrs. Pearson regarding being the boss in her family?
Q.6. Doris says, “You’ll see” to her father.What does she mean?
Q.7. Mrs. Annie Pearson and Mrs. Fitzgerald are totally opposite to each other in their attitude. Show  the difference between their personalities?
Q.8. What advice does Mrs. Fitzgerald give to Mrs. Pearson after they change back personalities?
Q.9. How does the Pearson family spend the evening together?
Q.10.This is the most humorous play with many humorous situations. Which situation did you enjoy the most?


Long answer questions:
Q.1. What do you know about feminism and how has the playwright depicted it in this play?
Q.2. As Mrs. Fitzgerald, write a diary entry based on the events of the day.
Q.3. Years later, Mrs. Pearson meets Mrs. Fitzgerald again. Create the conversation they have.
Q.4. Doris grows up to be a young woman married to man different than the one she had been dating during the play. Write a letter as Doris to her mother sharing the intricacies of the daughter's married life.
Q.5. Create a fictional piece about an evening at the Fitzgeralds' home contrasting it with the Pearson's family's day as depicted by the play. Create new characters as required but keep the matriarchs as the main protagonists.